The lute: a thumbnail history

LuteThe lute’s beauty of tone, musical versatility and symbolic association with heaven made it once the most popular instrument in Europe, the ‘prince’ of all instruments. From the Arabian oud to the medieval, renaissance and baroque lutes, this article briefly charts the development of this versatile, beautiful and enduring instrument.

We begin with a recording of a saraband by Ennemond Gaultier, one of the leading lights of the new French lute style in the 17th century.

Click the picture to play the video.
Saraband de Mesangeau by Ennemond Gaultier (c. 1575-1651), played by
Ian Pittaway on an 11 course French baroque lute. All of Ennemond Gaultier’s
music was published posthumously, so cannot be dated precisely.

From the oud to the medieval lute

The medieval European lute is directly descended from the gut-strung Arabian oud. Indeed, the name lute is derived from the Arabic, al ‘ud, meaning the wood. The first evidence of an oud being played in Europe is from the 9th century, with the arrival of Ziryāb from Baghdad, a musician in the service of the Caliph of Córdoba, Spain. Evidence for the oud being played more widely and by Europeans doesn’t appear until the 13th century, in the beautifully decorated book of songs in praise of the Virgin Mary, Cantigas de Santa María, composed 1257–83 in the court of Alfonso X, King of eight regions in modern day Spain and one in Portugal.

Oud from the Iberian Cantigas de Santa María, 1257–83. Note the three roses on
the right of the plucking hand, another rose top left, with a fifth that would be
symmetrically placed, here hidden by the arm; and further decorative markings.
(As with all images, click for larger view.)

By c. 1300 the oud in the west was being developed into a distinct western lute. Lutes did not occur in iconography in any numbers, though, until 1380-1400, so we can assume it was not widely popular until then. Like the oud, medieval lutes were played with a quill plectrum. No music survives for the medieval lute, or for virtually any individual medieval instrument.

Left: This is possibly the earliest image of the oud being reshaped into a distinct European lute,
still fretless as most ouds were. This image is from the embroidered Steeple Aston cope, England,
c. 1310-40. Changes happened gradually and there was always variety. As we see in the images below,
structural changes to the shape of the lute continued throughout the lute’s popular life over centuries.
Right: Fretted medieval lute, detail from a painting by the Cologne School, c. 1440.
The iconographical evidence suggests that western lutes were without frets until around
1400, just at the time when lute images, little seen previously, began to proliferate.
Here we have 4 Italian images of lutes, all fretless, from this transitional period.
Top left: anonymous, The calling of Saints Peter and Andrew, MS 34, f.172, Bologna, 1389-1404.
Top right: Andrea di Bartolo, The Coronation of the Virgin, 1405-07.
Bottom left: anonymous, mural in San Francesco Church at Giffoni Valle Piana, Venice, c. 1400.
Bottom right: Ottaviano Nelli, Madonna del Belvedere, Church of Santa Maria Nuova, Gubbio, 1403.
(As with all pictures, click to see larger in new window.)

For the tuning of the 4 course medieval lute, we turn to the gittern. In his De inventione et usu musicae, 1481-83, Johannes Tinctoris describes the gittern thus: “It is very clear that the instrument invented by the Catalans, which is called by some the guiterra and by others the guiterna, came from the lyre.” This is entirely in keeping with medieval and renaissance music theorists, who linked all stringed instruments, plucked and bowed, to the lyre of ancient Greece and Rome. Tinctoris continues: “For this one [the gittern] takes the shape of a lute (although it is much smaller than that) and the form of a shell and the arrangement and contact of the strings.” In other words, both gittern and lute have the same tuning and the same manner of contact with the strings, i.e. played with a plectrum. Tinctoris must have meant the same relative tuning, since the gittern was, as he stated, smaller than the lute. This same relative tuning may be one reason that gittern and lute are often seen duetting in 14th century depictions.

Lute and gittern duet in a detail from Agnolo Gaddi’s Coronation of the Virgin with six angels, c. 1390.
The tuning of the citole and gittern, as shown in the Berkeley Theory Manuscript, written before 1361.

The tuning itself is described in the Berkeley Theory Manuscript, probably written by Johannes Vaillant, a 14th century Parisian music teacher, who died in 1361. As we see above, the drawing of a gittern (below) gives a tuning (highest to lowest) of c’’ f’ b e, which is most odd, and is clearly wrong, since it is contradicted by the text. The citole (above) is shown with a tuning of c” g’ d’ c, followed by the comment that the gittern tuning is the same, but with the 4th course loosened to a fourth below the adjacent course, clearly giving a gittern tuning of c” g’ d’ a.

How was the mistake made on the drawing? If the c’’ f’ b e tuning is reversed to e” b’ f’ c’ then we have a tuning entirely in fourths, as described in the text, if we also flatten the e” and b’. It appears that the author knew the gittern was tuned in fourths but became confused: in the drawing, he forgot that in the text he had written c” g’ d’ c’ for the citole and therefore the tuning c” g’ d’ a for the gittern; calculated the gittern tuning in fourths from the top course as if it was the bottom course, giving a tuning of ebbb f’ c’, but then omitted to write the flats and again reversed the tuning, writing it backwards as c’’ f’ b e on the drawing. Reading the text alone makes gittern tuning unequivocally clear.

Medieval lutes appear in various sizes, but the principle is clear: 4 courses in fourths, giving a tuning most likely at the pitches of g’ d’ a e. The fact that the Arabian oud, predecessor of the western medieval lute, was tuned in fourths, further strengthens the case for this tuning.

The arrival of the renaissance lute

The renaissance began in Italy in the 14th century and spread across Europe in the 15th century. During the 15th century, three changes happened to the lute: it increased the number of courses, changed its tuning, and began to be played with fingertips rather than plectrums, creating what we now term the renaissance lute.

In the 1420s, the lute gained a 5th course, though this was not entirely universal: as we see below, 4 course lutes were still in evidence in the late 15th and even into the 16th century. The lute gained a 6th course, evident in iconography from 1475, and again we see that 5 course lutes were still portrayed into the 16th century. 

Left: 4 course lutes in Francesco del Cossa’s fresco, Allegory of April: Triumph of Venus,
before 1470, in the Salone dei Mesi (Room of Months), Palazzo Schifanoia, Ferrara, Italy.
Right: A detail of a very late 4 course plectrum lute in Jean Bellegambe, Le Cellier Altarpiece, 1509,
originally in Clairvaux, France, now in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, USA.

With the addition of the 5th course there was a new tuning, introducing the interval of a third among the fourths between open courses. However, we cannot say with certainty that the ‘new’ interval of a third between two of the courses was introduced at the same time as the 5th course. It is possible that the 5 course lute (and gittern, which also gained a 5th course in the 15th century) continued to be tuned in fourths before the advent of the new tuning. A 4 course lute tuned g’ d’ a e would have a 5th course of B if it remained in fourths, and a 4 course gittern tuned c’’ g’ d’ a would have a 5th course of e, both of which are serviceable and argue theoretically in favour of the continuation of tuning in fourths when the 5th course was added, as indeed happened with the Arabian oud in the 15th century.

However, different sizes of lute are evident in the medieval and renaissance periods. A smaller 4 course lute in a’ would be tuned a’ e’ b f#, with an additional 5th course of c#. In an unequal temperament, with sharps and flats being different notes, having two courses tuned to accidentals may have been problematic. Raising the 4th and 5th course by one semitone, creating the ‘new’ interval of a third between the 3rd and 4th courses, resolves this problem, giving the standard renaissance tuning for an a’ lute of a’ e’ b g d, or its relative equivalent at a different pitch, with a 5 course lute in g’ lute tuned g’ d’ a f c.  

All medieval plucked chordophones, including the lute, were played with plectrums. Medieval plectrum instruments were capable of polyphony because the voices were of a similar pitch, meaning polyphonic music could be played almost entirely on adjacent courses. During the first half of the 15th century, under the influence of English composer John Dunstaple, the new style of renaissance polyphony spread voices wide apart in pitch. Lutenists found a way of playing it solo, first by playing with a combination of plectrum and outstretched fingers, then by playing with fingertips alone, using three independent fingers and a thumb on the right hand (presuming a right-handed player), with the little finger anchored on the soundboard. Thus a musical revolution began.

The change from quill playing to finger playing came gradually and unevenly, but was eventually universal. If we take Germany as an example, from left to right, in chronological order: finger player, from the housebook of Wolfegg Castle, 1480, anonymous artist; plectrum player in a print by Israhel van Meckenem, c. 1495; finger player in a print by Albrecht Dürer, 1497.
The change from quill playing to finger playing developed gradually and spread unevenly.
It began in the 1470s and was universal by the 1530s.
Three examples from Germany illustrate the gradual change.
Left: 5 course finger player, from the housebook of Wolfegg Castle, 1480, anonymous artist.
Centre: 6 course plectrum player in a print by Israhel van Meckenem, c. 1495.
Right: 6 course finger player in a print by Albrecht Dürer, 1497.

Lute tablature

Lute music was written in a new style of notation created in c. 1460: stringed instrument tablature. This is a system indicating which course to play, which fret to play and what rhythm to play, and by this means it is far more specific and instructive for the instrument than the treble or bass clef staff notation most common today. Lute music was written exclusively in tablature in handwritten household books and in print. Four different systems developed.

German lute tablature.
German lute tablature.

German lute tablature, adapted from organ tablature, was the earliest and most complex, using numbers to indicate courses and alphabetical letters to indicate fret positions, with rhythm flags above. It remained specific to Germany and German-speaking countries, used from c. 1470 until the early 17th century, when French tablature became favoured.

French tablature was used in the French and English speaking world, but it was probably created in Italy, as the first evidence for its use is in the Italian Pesaro manuscript of c. 1480s–1511. Six lines represent the six courses, with the first course at the top. (When extra bass courses or diapasons were later added to the lute, these notes appeared underneath the lines.) Alphabetical letters show you where to place the left hand – a for an open string, b for first fret, c for second fret, and so on – and rhythm flags above the letters show the rhythm for the plucking hand. Where a note lacks a rhythm flag, you play the last value of note indicated. Extra symbols show ornaments or grace notes and, in some cases, dots under the fret letters show which right hand finger to use – one dot for finger one, two dots for finger two, occasionally three dots for finger three, a vertical stroke for the thumb.

Two pages from the heart-shaped Pesaro manuscript, an Italian book of lute music dated c. 1499, the earliest surviving example of French tablature.
Two pages from the heart-shaped Pesaro manuscript, an Italian book of lute music
dated c. 1480s–1511, the earliest surviving example of French tablature.

Italian tablature appears, from the evidence of the Bologna and Thibault manuscripts, to have developed in Italy contemporaneously with French tablature. French tablature was quickly favoured elsewhere and fell out of favour in Italy, whereas Italian tablature firmly established itself in Italy and Spain. Italian and French tablature work to the same principles, except that in Italian tablature the sixth course is written on the top line down to the first course on the bottom line and, instead of letters for fret positions, there are numbers: 0 for an open course, 1 for the first fret and so on.

There was a fourth system, little used: Neapolitan tablature, in which the first course is shown as the top line, as in French tablature, and fret positions are shown as numbers, as in Italian tablature. 

A page in Italian lute tablature from the beautifully decorated Capirola lute book, written in Venice 1515-1520 by Vitale, a pupil of lutenist Vincenzo Capirola.
A page in Italian lute tablature from the beautifully decorated Capirola lute book,
written in Venice 1515-20 by Vitale, a pupil of lutenist Vincenzo Capirola.

The lute inspired musical masters to new heights of musical beauty and inventiveness: in Italy, most famously Francesco Canova da Milano, Vincenzo Capirola and Joan Ambrosio Dalza; in Germany, Hans Gerle and father and son Hans and Melchior Neusidler; and in England, father and son John and Robert Johnson, Anthony Holborne and, most esteemed of all, John Dowland.

The lute’s wide appeal and versatility is shown in its use in such a wide range of musical styles and playing contexts: solos and duets; song accompaniment; household entertainment; religious and secular music; patronage by royalty; and an integral part of the broken consort, an ensemble of lute, cittern, bandora, bass viol, treble viol or violin, and recorder or flute.

The sound of the lute

  • Prince’s Mask Tune, possibly by Robert Johnson, c. 1620, played by Ian Pittaway on a 6 course renaissance lute in a’.

Part of the renaissance lute’s great appeal is its sound. This is partially achieved by its very light construction; and partially by its style of playing, known as ‘thumb inside’ or ‘thumb under’. The hand is roughly parallel to the strings, not at a right angle, like the modern guitar. The effect is to give a round, mellow sound, as at this angle it is the soft flesh of the fingers making contact with the strings. It also enables great proficiency in fast passages by using a forearm movement, a practice which appears to be directly descended from quill technique, but with the thumb on the downstroke and index finger on the upstroke instead of a plectrum held between the fingers.

A portrait by Giulio Campi, possibly of Francesco Canova da Milano (1497–1543), an Italian lutenist revered throughout the renaissance. Note the ‘thumb inside’ hand position, parallel to the strings.

There is evidence that the sound of the lute in the early 16th century was quite unlike the clean, pure sound expected of early music revival players today, but was related to the more strident sound of the bray harp. The bray harp was the standard European harp from 1400 to the 1670s. The pins holding in the strings were L shaped, turned to make contact with the strings when they vibrated, giving a frisson not unlike the sympathetic strings of the sitar or a distorted electric guitar. The sound of the bray harp can be heard here. The beautifully decorated Capirola lute book, a manuscript written in Venice 1515-1520, states that a player should “make it so that the first fret almost touches the strings, and so on to the end, because as the frets are nearer to the string, the strings sound like a harp, and the lute appears better.” In other words, lute strings should buzz against the frets, giving the sound of a bray harp. The lute began to be fretted in around 1400, the same time that brays began to appear on harps. This may be more than coincidental: the earliest sound of frets on lutes may have been the same as brays on harps, so that they shared the same braying frisson for more than the first century of the fretted lute, perhaps for much longer. Certainly this was so in Venice 1515-20, as the Capirola lute book shows, and into the 1520s, as we see in the painting below.

The anonymous artist who painted A concert, a Venetian work from the mid-1520s (above left), paid great attention to detail. We see music being held that is readable (detail, above right), a 5 course lute with clearly-shown octave stringing on the third, fourth and fifth course (detail, below left), and the differentiated triple fretting designed to give the bray lute effect. (Click the picture to see it larger in a new window.) To hear a bray lute being played and further explained by Bor Zuljan, click here.

The development of the renaissance lute

Over time, the number of courses (pairs of strings) and the overall range of notes increased: from the medieval 4 courses to 5 in the 1420s, then to the renaissance 6 courses in 1481 (though, as we see above, some were still playing 5 course lutes into the 16th century). Then extra bass courses or diapasons began to be added, making the 7, 8, 9 and eventually 10 course lute by 1600. These extra basses beyond 6 courses were tuned diatonically, i.e. in steps down the scale, and so were meant to be played open rather than fretted.

As the number of basses increased, two changes happened. The right hand position altered, moving from a thumb inside to a thumb outside position. While this had been around for some years with a minority of players, the increase in numbers of diapasons made this the widely-favoured position by the 1590s. This shift to thumb outside also reflected a change in musical tastes, as this gave a more trebly sound, perhaps influenced by the pronounced treble timbre of the plucked keyboards, the harpsichord family, which were becoming increasingly popular.

Frans Hals’ painting of 1623, Buffoon playing a lute, is a good illustration of ‘thumb outside’. Since the lutenist is still playing a 6 course lute in 1623, more than two decades after 10 course lutes were available, it also shows that not everyone followed the trend for increasing numbers of diapasons or basses.
Frans Hals’ painting of 1623, Buffoon
playing a lute, is a good illustration of
thumb outside technique. Since the lutenist
is still playing a 6 course lute in 1623, more
than two decades after 10 course lutes were
available, it also shows that not everyone
followed the trend for increasing numbers
of diapasons or basses.

The Stammbuch (c. 1600) of German lutenist Johann Stobaeus was strident: “The right hand is to be held close to the bridge, and the little finger firmly placed and held down. The thumb is to be stretched out strongly, so that it stands out almost as a limb to the other fingers. The fingers are to be pulled cleanly inwards under the thumb, so that the sound resonates cleanly and strongly. The thumb is to be struck outwards, not inwards like the people in the past used to do [i.e. now move the thumb over the hand, not into the hand] … it sounds purer, sharper, and brighter, the other sounds quite rotten and muffled.” To add weight to his argument, Stobaeus lists “[t]hese famous lutenists [who] used the thumb outside”, including “Dowland the Englishman, who at first used his thumb the other way.”

It’s worth stating that players of the renaissance lute today, who have taken great pains to understand and master the thumb inside technique, are delighted by the full, warm, round sound it produces and certainly would not agree with Stobaeus’ hyperbole that it “sounds quite rotten and muffled”!

The second change was structural. In Robert Dowland’s publication of 1610, A Varietie of Lute Lessons, his father John Dowland wrote a section called Other necessary Observations belonging to the lute, in which he commented that “these frets of late years were but seaven in number, as witnesseth Hans Gerle Lutenist, Citizen and Lute-maker of Nurenburge (for so he stileth himselfe in his booke of Tableture, printed 1533.) … Yet presently after there was added an eight fret: for my selfe was borne but thirty yeeres after Hans Gerles booke was printed, and all the Lutes which I can remember used eight frets, and so ended at the Semitonium cum Diapente. But yet as Plautus saith, Nature thirsting after knowledge, is alwayes desirous to invent and seeke more, by the wittie conceit (which I have seene, and not altogether to be disalowed) of our most famous countriman M. Mathias Mason Lutenist, and one of the Groomes of his Majesties most honourable Privie Chamber, (as it hath ben told me,) invented three frets more, the which were made of wood, and glued upon the belly, and from thence about some few yeeres after, by the French Nation, the neckes of the lutes were lengthned, and thereby increased two frets more, so as all those Lutes which are most received and disired, are of tenne frets.”

The lengthening of lute necks referred to by Dowland was achieved by removing the neck and replacing it with a longer one. This also had the effect of lowering the overall pitch, as the longer the same density string at the same tension, the lower the note. This, in turn, had the effect of making the delicate first course more liable to break, so some 10 course lutes were fitted with a treble rider, as were later baroque lutes (see picture right), so that the first course did not have such a sharp angle from the nut to the peg. (The nut is the piece of bone with grooves in to keep the strings in place.)

Other changes had been taking place in Italy before the turn of the century. In c. 1580, the chitarrone was created, distinguished by its extra peg box to facilitate a lower pitch of basses beyond the 6 melody courses. Due to the large size of the chitarrone, the first two courses could not be tuned up to pitch and were therefore tuned down an octave. This may or may not originally have been the same instrument as the theorbo (tiorba) in the same tuning – 16th century writers contradict each other on the matter – but by 1600 the two names were synonymous. The chitarrone or theorbo was visually similar but distinct from the arciliuto or archlute, designed in 1594 by Alessandro Piccinini. The archlute retained standard lute tuning, and Piccinini recommended that it be played with nails rather than flesh on the right hand, creating a sharper, thinner, more trebly sound. Piccinini stated that the differently-named liuto attiorbato was a misnomer, as the name suggests it is related to the theorbo, whereas it is, he wrote, a synonym for the archlute he invented.

Above left: Chitarrone/therobo in The Duet by Jan Molenaer, c. 1630.
Above right: Theorbo held by Mary Sidney, Lady Wroth,
in a painting attributed to John de Critz, c. 1620.
Below left: An experimental archlute, designed in 1594 by Alessandro Piccinini
and made by Wendelin Tieffenbruchar. This failed because the basses,
being played in the middle of the string length, had a weak sound.
Below centre: What the archlute became, as engraved in Marin Mersenne’s
Seconde Partie de L’Harmonie Universelle (1637).
Below right: Original liuto attiorbato made by Matteo Sellas, 1638, front and back views.

The spread of the French baroque lute

During the renaissance and until around 1620, the 6 main melody courses of the lute consistently had a standard tuning, known as viel ton, relatively speaking the same as a modern guitar but with the third course a semitone down. The pitch of a whole instrument depends on its size, from the large bass lute to the small treble lute. The ‘standard’ or most favoured size gave it a pitch of g’ on the top course, a minor third above a modern guitar, giving it a tuning, 1st to 6th, of g’ d’ a f c G.

As John Dowland noted in 1610, changes were afoot in France to enlarge the size of the lute and thus lower its pitch, an idea that was to spread; and, by the 1620s, French, Swiss, Polish and English lutenists were experimenting with different ways of tuning the instrument. By 1650, D minor tuning and its close variants, which first appeared in 1638, had become the norm for French lute players: now the top 6 courses were tuned, 1st to 6th, f’ d’ a f d A. The 4 basses then followed down the diatonic scale: G F E D. When this D minor tuning made playing in some keys awkward, tuning modifications were made to some courses to fit the key. Soon an 11th course of C followed, then up to 13 courses by 1720. The new D minor tuning and overall lower pitch created a completely different instrument to the renaissance lute, with old ways of playing now impossible: a new sonic world had opened up.

While Italian lutenists retained viel ton renaissance tuning (and its necessary variant on the theorbo) on their double-headed lutes, French lutenists changed to D minor tuning and retained their single-headed lutes. In this divergence, the centre of the lute world was shifting: the main focus had moved to France. Foremost were Ennemond Gaultier, known as “le vieux Gaultier”, ‘the old Gaultier’ (a piece by whom begins this article, also available here); his cousin, Denis Gaultier; and Charles Mouton. And, since French players had developed this new way of tuning and playing, the D minor lute was called the ‘French lute’ in England.

Charles Mouton, c. 1626–1710, one of the influential new wave of French lutenist-composers.
Charles Mouton, c. 1626–1710, one of the influential new wave of French lutenist-composers.

French lute style became hugely influential beyond the lute. The style brisé was an arpeggiated way of playing where the tune was deliberately somewhat hidden by breaking up chords into their individual notes. French musicians on other instruments then used the technique, calling it style luthé – lute style.

In Scotland, lutenists used the French lute to play French music and, much moreso, traditional Scottish tunes. Thanks to the surviving late 17th century Balcarres lute manuscript, we have some of the earliest versions of these traditional cultural treasures arranged for lute by a variety of Scottish musicians.

By the close of the 17th century, the chief focus of lute composition had moved again, now to Austria and Germany, where lutenists were developing a more melodic style which continued to flourish in Germany long after the ‘French lute’ had ceased to be popular in France. German luthiers developed a Germanic version of the French lute and Sylvius Leopold Weiss became its greatest exponent in the 18th century. Weiss’ beautiful and impressive music was the last glorious chapter in the history of the instrument’s cultural significance.


© Ian Pittaway. Not to be reproduced in any form without permission. All rights reserved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *